FUND RECOMMENDATIONS

Page Summary: Mandates matter more than managers


Discussion and Evidence

Sceptic: Even if these are actual recommendations, they are still theoretical. Recommendations for specific funds are a different matter.
Response: To show that this works as well, here is a review of fund recommendions by our CEO for his column in Investment Adviser magazine.
Key Facts: Since publication the majority have all beaten their sector peers, and many have done so by substantial margins.
Statistics: Total returns for the year to 31/3/2004 are +38% on average versus 28% for the respective IMA sector peer groups

Logo_InvestmentAdviser.gif (4259 bytes)

Dewhirst's View of the IMA sectors reviewed each week
(Recommendations over one year old by March 2004)

Funds Recommended IMA Sector 12 Month Total Return
Fund Sector Gap
St. James Place Recovery Fund Global Growth 59% 25% 34%
GAM International Growth Fund Global Growth 55% 25% 31%
Legg Mason European TMT Technology & Telecoms 56% 25% 30%
Shires Smaller Companies IT UK Equity Income 58% 30% 28%
Fidelity Special Situations UK All Companies 54% 31% 24%
Govett Asian Recovery IT Global Emerging Mkts 69% 48% 22%
M&G Global Basics Specialist 43% 25% 18%
M&G Recovery Fund UK All Companies 45% 31% 15%
Baring Korea Specialist 37% 25% 12%
Fidelity Asian Values IT Global Emerging Mkts 60% 48% 12%
Scottish Oriental Smaller Companies IT Far East ex Japan 47% 37% 9%
Threadneedle Emerging Market Bond Global Bond 10% 0% 9%
M&G Emerging Market Bond Global Bond 7% 0% 7%
Jupiter High Income UK Equity & Bond Income 27% 20% 6%
Aberdeen Asia Pacific Far East inc Japan 43% 38% 5%
Fidelity American Special Situations North America 15% 11% 4%
Newton Balanced Managed Balanced Managed 23% 22% 1%
Templeton Emerging Markets IT Global Emerging Mkts 47% 48% -1%
Norwich Union Preference Share UK Other Bond 12% 13% -2%
No Recommendation Money Market 0% 3% -3%
No Recommendation UK Gilt 0% 3% -3%
Family Balanced Managed Balanced Managed 17% 22% -5%
Aberforth UK Smaller Companies UK Smaller Companies 60% 65% -5%
C.F. Odey European Europe ex UK 24% 30% -6%
No Recommendation UK Corporate Bond 0% 7% -7%
Teather & Greenwood UK Smaller Cos. UK Smaller Companies 57% 65% -8%
Aberforth Smaller Companies IT UK Smaller Companies 55% 65% -10%
Average Recommendation 36% 28% 8%

 

Sceptic: That may show your recommendations can beat their peer groups, but it does not show which peer groups are likely to out-perform
Response: Look at these paper income and growth portfolios for two other journals. They are more appropriate tests of asset allocation.
Key Facts: At the first anniversary of their launch in January and March 2003 respectively, both portfolios beat the average Managed Fund substantially.
Statistics: The income portfolio for Fund Stratey was up +42% versus +31% and the growth portfolio for Professional Adviser was up +39% versus +24%

 

Logo_FundStrategy.jpg (6771 bytes) Logo_ProfessionalAdviser.jpg (8435 bytes)
Income portfolio recommended by Nick Dewhirst
My Asset Allocation, dated 30th March 2003
Growth portfolio recommended by Nick Dewhirst
"Time to get back into equities", dated 30th January 2003

Please email for copies of "Dewhirst's View" on IMA fund sector reviews, specifying sector of interest
For further information on fund portfolios, please email reports on Income Portfolio or Growth Portfolio


Up ] Back-Tested Simulation ] Live Track Record ] [ Fund Recommendations ] Audited Model Portfolio ]

 

Copyright © 1999 Professional Investment Tools Ltd., authorised by the Financial Services Authority. Independent Financial Adviser (UK) and member of Investorside Research Association (US). Please read Financial Health Warning and Licence Agreement. UK laws apply exclusively. Principal sources: Consensus Economics, Corel Corp., FIBV, Global Financial Data, PIT, national governments and stock exchanges. Information and opinions are based on sources believed to be reliable and accurate. However PIT does not guarantee this to be the case, and does not accept liability for any loss arising. This is for information only and does not constitute a solicitation to deal in any securities. Opinions are liable to change. Past performance is no guarantee of future success. Last modified: May 19, 2004.